A | New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) One of the judges in the Supreme Court bench, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, differed with the view of his colleague, Justice Hemant Gupta on many issues.
Justice Dhulia said that asking a pre university schoolgirl to take off her hijab at her school gate, is an invasion on her privacy and dignity.
"Asking a pre university schoolgirl to take off her hijab at her school gate, is an invasion on her privacy and dignity. It is an attack on their dignity, and then ultimately it is a denial to them of secular education. These are clearly violative of Article 19(1)(a), Article 21, and Article 25(1) of the Constitution of India," Justice Dhulia said, in his verdict.
"Under our Constitutional scheme, wearing a hijab should be simply a matter of Choice. It may or may not be a matter of essential religious practice, but it still is, a matter of conscience, belief, and expression. If she wants to wear hijab, even inside her class room, she cannot be stopped, if it is worn as a matter of her choice, as it may be the only way her conservative family will permit her to go to school, and in those cases, her hijab is her ticket to education," Justice Dhulia said, in his verdict.
Justice Dhulia even went onto say that the unfortunate fallout of the hijab restriction would be that we would have denied education to a girl child. A girl child for whom it is still not easy to reach her school gate.This case here, therefore, has also to be seen in the perspective of the challenges already faced by a girl child in reaching her school.
"The question this Court would put before itself is also whether we are making the life of a girl child any better by denying her education merely because she wears a hijab!," Justice Dhulia questioned?
Our Constitution has visualised a just society and it is for this reason that the first virtue that is secures for the citizens is ‘Justice’ which is the first of our Preambular promises, he said.
On the other hand, the judge heading the bench of the Supreme Court, Justice Hemant Gupta, differed with the view of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and said that the Government (Karnataka) Order cannot be said to be contrary to the State goal of promoting literacy and education as mandated under the Constitution.
"Article 21A is not applicable as all the students are over 14 years of age. The students have a right to education under Article 21, but not of insisting on wearing something additional to the uniform, in a secular school, as a part of their religion," Justice Gupta, heading the bench of the Top Court said.
"Secularism applicable to all citizens. Permitting one religious community to wear religious symbols would be antithesis of secularism. Govt Order can't be said to be against secularism or objective of Karnataka Education Act," Justice Gupta in his 133-page, out of 209-page, verdict said.
"It can't be said that State is restricting the access to education to the girl students through such an Order. The Government Order only ensures that the uniform prescribed is adhered to by the students and it cannot be said that State is restricting the access to education to the girl students through such an Order, Justice Gupta said.
He went on to say that the Act itself contemplates providing of opportunities and facilities in a healthy manner and maintaining the dignity of childhood and youth so that there is no moral or material abandonment. "The uniform for the students has been prescribed so that there is no distinction between the students coming from diverse background and that each student grows in an environment of equality, fairness and equal opportunities," Justice Gupta said.
The uniform is an equalizer of inequalities. Therefore, prescribing uniform for children at an impressionable age is not only important but has a salutary effect on the mental development of the child to grow in the environment of oneness, he said.
Justice Gupta, find that the following 11 questions arise for consideration in the present appeals:
Whether the appeals should be heard along with Kantaru Rajeevaru (Right to Religion) and/or should the present appeals be referred to the Constitution Bench.?
Whether the State Government could delegate its decision to implement the wearing of uniform by the College Development Committee or the Board of Management or otherwise on headscarves is ex facie violative of Section 143 of the Act?
What is ambit and scope of the right to freedom of ‘conscience’ and ‘religion’ under Article 25? What is the ambit and scope of essential religious practices under Article 25 of the Constitution?
UNI SM BAV GNK。 Ranveer Singh’s powerhouse performance in Aditya Dhar’s Dhurandhar has captured nationwide attention, but another actor who has unexpectedly become the internet’s favourite is Akshaye Khanna. Playing the enigmatic Rehman Dakait, Akshaye has left audiences mesmerised with his effortless screen command. Even those who haven’t watched the film yet are obsessing over his now-viral dance sequence to the Arabic track FA9LA, sung by Bahraini rapper Flipperachi. What most fans don’t know, however, is that the entire moment was created on the spot by Akshaye himself.
In a conversation with Mid Day, choreographer Vijay Ganguly revealed that the original plan for the song was far more restrained. “The track marks Rehman Dakait being crowned Sher-E-Baloch. Akshaye was supposed to walk through the dancers and take his place on the throne,” he explained. “But watching the energy on set, he suddenly said he wanted to dance a little as he walked in. None of us had any idea what he was about to do. He just entered, felt the vibe, and performed spontaneously. That’s the kind of instinctive brilliance he has.”
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Ranveer Singh (@ranveersingh)
The shoot, set in the high-altitude terrain of Ladakh, wasn’t easy on Akshaye either. Ganguly shared that the actor was battling severe altitude sickness throughout the schedule. “Akshaye would keep a small oxygen cylinder with him. During the song shoot, his oxygen levels dropped. After every shot, he’d put on the mask, recover, and immediately return for the next take,” he said. “Despite all that, he delivered a flawless performance and wrapped the sequence in one stretch before heading home.”
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Ranveer Singh (@ranveersingh)
The scene has since become one of the standout moments of Dhurandhar, praised for its swagger. What stands out the most for fans is Akshaye’s raw, magnetic presence.
Featuring a star-studded cast including Arjun Rampal, Sara Arjun, Sanjay Dutt, R. Madhavan and Rakesh Bedi, Dhurandhar continues its strong box-office run. Fans are now eagerly gearing up for Dhurandhar 2, slated for release on March 19, 2026.Also Read: Dhurandhar Box Office Day 4: Ranveer Singh’s Film Sees a Dip in Collection。
Current article:http://www.cousizhegaobaolengkuo.bond/511ij5/f2d.html
Published on:00:34:17
相关阅读 Australia, Singapore sign green economy agreement人民银行安徽省分行聚焦“资金链”精准治理，多维度推进反诈工作新西兰公布奥库斯协议进展：只要高科技，不针对中国拉科布:选怀斯曼确实判断失误 搞砸了那个榜眼签乐小星乐游科创盛会 2026世界人工智能大会的体彩身影EconoScope | Powering AI era: Why China is betting on nuclear energyChina’s first supernode for 2t-parameter models enters service in Ulanqab大瑞铁路高黎贡山隧道挖掘进度过半 建设者全力攻克“三高四活跃”地质难题
热门文章
为何说素食者比肉食者更容易患抑郁症？研究揭示背后的科学原理
서울시 "용산공원 주택공급 철회시 그린벨트 일부 해제 검토"
银巴铁路开启静态验收 预计年底具备开通条件
商汤科技：上半年首次录得IFRS净利润6.17亿元，为上市以来首次录得盈利
最新文章
毕业季、暑期出行注意！大学生订民宿避坑：到店无房、临时涨价怎么办？2026去哪儿民宿保障与价格指南
韦东奕主编练习册，迫于压力下架？
奥克兰又一条公交车道“大创收”，每周罚金超过10万纽币站牌“搬”进社区，服务“走”进心坎绥中荒地镇开展“守护蔚蓝海岸，环保从我做起”活动重磅应用密集上线，同时“硬刚”谷歌、亚马逊和Meta，OpenAI急了？今年要“烧”85亿美元
人气排行 原创 上海“最阴森”的旅游景点，曾经是屠宰场，文艺青年却疯狂追捧？Xbox 25周年周边扎堆！Backbone和盖世小鸡齐发限定手柄智能产业驶入发展快车道［税务］税务部门助力旅游服务热辣升级美国判了药明康德缓刑中消协发布中国消费者绿色消费指南破题具身智能“数据荒” 北京中关村机器人“训练基地”揭秘,破题具身智能“数据荒” 北京中关村机器人“训练基地”揭秘十九小学•劳动 | 多彩劳动课 温情成长路
查看所有0条评论>>