51job
"보완수사권 작동 중 발생" 선부터 그은 與…野 "수사권 실험 중단해야"_我的网站
A |
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported.
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong.
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported.
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said.
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued.
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said.
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday.
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said.
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added.
。
B | [앵커]민주당은 이번 사건이 검찰 보완수사권 폐지에 대한 여론 악화로 이어질까봐 우려하는 모습입니다. 김민석 대표는 경찰 6대 폐단을 뿌리뽑겠다면서도 보완수사권 문제와는 무관하다고 선부터 그었습니다.오늘 법사위에서도 이 문제를 놓고 신경전이 오갔는데 황정민 기자가 자세히 전합니다. [리포트]대표 직속 경찰개혁추진단 구성을 지시한 민주당 김민석 대표는 "경찰 개혁에 박차를 가하겠다"며 '경찰 6대 폐단'을 뿌리뽑겠다고 밝혔습니다.어제에 이어 연이틀 경찰 개혁을 강조한 겁니다.다만 제주 실종 허위종결 사건은 오는 10월부터 시행되는 검찰 보완수사권 폐지와는 무관하다고 선을 그었습니다.김민석 / 더불어민주당 대표"일각의 이야기와는 달리 현재 검찰의 보완수사권이 작동하는 상태에서 벌어진 일입니다."이번 사건이 검찰 보완수사권 폐지 논란으로 다시 번질 조짐에 진화에 나선 걸로 보입니다.실제 국민의힘은 제주 실종 사건을 언급하며 보완수사권 복원을 주장했습니다.주진우 / 국민의힘 의원"경찰이 온전하게 수사권을 행사하는 것이 국민의 생명과 안전을 보호할 수 있을 것이냐하는 근본적인 의문이 드는 상황이거든요"김동아 / 민주당 의원"제주 여성 실종 사건은 보완수사권이 있을 때 일어난 일이고 그게 수사와 무슨 연관이 있습니까?"민주당이 국민의힘 소속인 최영중 전 청주시의원 성범죄 사건을 꺼내자 고성이 오가기도 했습니다.서영교 / 법사위원장"최영중 시의원이 12세 미만 아동을 성착취했어요. 국민의힘 한마디 사과가 없어, 국민의힘 시의원인데"주진우 / 국민의힘 의원"아니 물을 탈 걸 물을 타십시오. 지금 제주 여성 때문에 국민이 얼마나 분노하는데 그걸 물을 타고 있어요?"김태규 / 국민의힘 의원"그거하고 이거하고 뭔 상관이 있냐고"서영교 / 국회 법사위원장"국민의힘에서 공천 준 사람 아니야?"김태규 / 국민의힘 의원"왜 또 반말이에요?"국민의힘은 "위험천만한 수사권 실험을 즉시 중단하라"고 촉구했습니다.TV조선 황정민입니다.。
Current article:http://www.cousizhegaobaolengkuo.bond/list_x2cmxon/aps4ez.html
Published on:14:05:01
