A | Beijing/London, Oct 18 (UNI) China's foreign ministry has defended an incident in which a Hong Kong protester was pulled into Chinese consulate grounds in the British city of Manchester and beaten up.
A spokesman said people had "illegally entered" the grounds and any country's diplomats would have taken "necessary measures" to protect their premises, the BBC reported.
On Tuesday, Hong Kong leader John Lee weighed in on the event, saying it should be dealt with in accordance with local laws.
Police are investigating an assault on the pro-democracy protester on Sunday. Footage shows men emerging from the consulate and dragging a man inside.
The violence has prompted loud calls for the UK government to summon China's ambassador, and possibly take further action.
The protester, identified as Bob, suffered several physical injuries and spent a night in hospital for treatment.
However, China is sticking to a different version of events from the police.
"People [who] intended to cause nuisance entered the Chinese Consulate-General in Manchester illegally... threatening the safety of a Chinese diplomatic facility," said foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin at a daily press briefing in Beijing.
He added that any attempt to infringe on the consulate's "tranquillity and dignity" would "not be tolerated".
According to a statement by the Greater Manchester Police, around 30 to 40 people had gathered outside the consulate and patrols were in the area to help maintain the "peaceful protest".
"Shortly before 4pm a small group of men came out of the building and a man was dragged into the consulate grounds and assaulted," a police statement said.
"Due to our fears for the safety of the man, officers intervened and removed the victim from the consulate grounds."
The consulate says protesters had displayed an insulting portrait of China's president.
Bob told BBC Chinese that "mainlanders" - people from mainland China, as opposed to Hong Kong - had come out of the consulate and destroyed their posters.
"As we tried to stop them, they dragged me inside, they beat me up," he said. "It's ridiculous. They [the attackers] shouldn't have done that. We are supposed to have freedom to say whatever we want here [in the UK]."
The protest took place on the same day China kicked off its twice-a-decade Communist Party Congress, where its leader President Xi Jinping is widely expected to secure a third term in power.
Xi had on Sunday made reference to the situation in Hong Kong, saying Beijing had turned the situation in the city from "chaos to governance".
Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law on the former British colony after pro-democracy demonstrations in 2019.
UNI ING。 在阅读此文之前，麻烦您点击一下“关注”，既方便您进行讨论和分享，又能给您带来不一样的参与感，感谢您的支持。本文内容均引用权威资料结合个人观点进行撰写，文中已标注文献来源及截图，请知悉。高僧不该是清贫度日，怎么也这么贪财？2022年，安徽一位高僧却花了4.5亿买地，名下甚至还有18家企业。于是人们纷纷议论，这怎么和我们印象中的和尚，太不一样了，他到底是谁，钱从哪里来？信源：斥资4.5亿买地少林寺进军房地产？实业电商拍抖音，寺庙生意远比你想得要多 澎湃新闻释永信的佛门之路1965年，刘应成出生于安徽阜阳，在父母潜移默化的影响下，他从小就对佛教产生了浓厚的兴趣。16岁那年，他毅然决然地选择了剃度出家，踏入了嵩山少林寺的大门，法号释永信。在很多人看来，出家意味着远离尘世喧嚣，过上清净无为的修行生活，然而释永信的佛门之路却并非如此简单。进入少林寺后，他展现出过人的天赋和坚定的决心，他不仅每日潜心研习佛经，刻苦练功，还积极参与寺内事务的管理，并展现出卓越的才能和独到的洞察力。他敏锐地意识到，在现代社会，仅靠传统的香火钱难以维持寺庙的正常运转和发展，于是他开始思考，如何将少林寺的文化资源转化为经济效益。1987年，年仅22岁的释永信便被选为少林寺管委会主任，开始全面负责寺院的各项工作。这一任命，对于年轻的释永信来说，既是机遇也是挑战，他肩负着重振少林寺的重任，也承担着来自各方的压力和质疑。然而，他并没有退缩，而是以非凡的勇气和智慧，带领少林寺走上了一条前所未有的商业化之路。
B | 商业版图扩张释永信上任后，少林寺的商业化进程便如火如荼地展开，其商业版图也迅速扩张，涉及多个领域，令人叹为观止。他组织少林武僧成立武僧团，进行商业演出，将少林功夫的魅力展现给世界各地的观众。
C | 武僧团的足迹遍布全球，不仅为少林寺带来了可观的经济收入，也让少林功夫成为了中国文化输出的重要载体。同时，释永信将少林寺打造成一个集宗教、文化、旅游于一体的5A级景区，他投入巨资修缮寺庙，改善基础设施，提升游客体验。少林寺的声名远播，吸引了越来越多的游客前来参观，门票收入也成为了少林寺的重要经济来源，每年数以百万计的游客涌入少林寺，为这座千年古刹注入了新的活力。为了进一步拓展商业领域，他还注册了700多个与“少林”相关的商标，涵盖了服装、食品、药品等多个领域。他将“少林”品牌商业化，使其成为一个具有巨大商业价值的文化符号，这种做法虽然引发了一些争议，但也为少林寺带来了丰厚的经济回报。不仅如此，他还积极推动少林寺的海外扩张，在全球范围内开设了多家少林分寺，将少林文化传播到世界各地。这些分寺不仅承担着弘扬佛法的使命，也为少林寺带来了可观的海外收入，进一步巩固了少林寺的国际地位。为了实现多元化经营，释永信还成立了少林寺武术学校、少林寺医院等机构，形成了一个涵盖教育、医疗等多个领域的产业链。他将少林寺的资源优势转化为经济效益，为少林寺的可持续发展奠定了坚实的基础。然而，最引人争议的莫过于释永信在房地产领域的投资，2022年，他斥资4.5亿在郑州购买了一块地皮，这一举动引发了轩然大波，也将他推上了舆论的风口浪尖。一个佛门高僧，为何要涉足房地产行业？这巨额资金的来源和去向又是什么？这些疑问萦绕在人们心头，成为了社会关注的焦点。争议与质疑释永信一系列的商业化举措，虽然为少林寺带来了前所未有的繁荣，但也引发了社会各界的广泛争议和质疑。于是人们开始反思：佛门清净之地，是否应该沾染如此浓厚的商业气息？佛教强调清净无为，四大皆空，而商业运作则充满了追逐利益的世俗气息，这种看似矛盾的结合，让很多人难以接受，认为释永信的做法玷污了佛门的清净，偏离了佛教的本质。同时随着少林寺商业版图的不断扩张，其经济收入也水涨船高，然而这些资金的具体流向和用途却缺乏公开透明的监管机制，引发了公众的担忧和质疑。
D | 有人怀疑，少林寺的资金是否被滥用或挪作他用，是否存在腐败问题。而且他身穿价值16万的袈裟，佩戴金丝楠木佛珠，出行豪车接送，这种奢华的生活方式与人们印象中简朴清修的僧人形象格格不入，引发了公众的强烈质疑。有人认为，释永信的所作所为与佛教戒律相悖，有损僧人形象，败坏了佛门清誉。2015年，一名自号“释正义”的少林寺弟子于网络实名举报释永信，宣称其存在伪造身份、私生活不检点以及涉嫌侵占少林寺财产等诸多问题。这一事件更是将释永信推上了舆论的风口浪尖，成为了社会热议的话题。虽然最终调查结果证明他没有违法行为，“释正义”的举报也被认定缺乏事实依据，但这起事件无疑对少林寺的声誉造成了负面影响，也加剧了公众对释永信的质疑。此外，少林寺与地方政府在门票收入分成问题上也存在纠纷，少林寺认为地方政府长期拖欠其门票收入分成，而政府则有不同的说法。这场经济纠纷，暴露出寺庙与政府之间复杂的利益关系，也让公众对少林寺的经济模式产生质疑，认为少林寺过度商业化，与地方政府的利益纠葛不清。笔者认为其实释永信的商业化运作，并非对佛教精神的背离，而是一种顺应时代潮流的创新。他将商业作为一种工具，用于传承和发扬少林文化，用于改善僧众的生活条件，用于支持慈善事业。他的目标，并非个人财富的积累，而是少林寺的繁荣发展，是佛教文化的弘扬光大，对此你怎么看呢？。
Current article:http://www.cousizhegaobaolengkuo.bond/yilacd/05c2v.html
Published on:04:27:48
